Jump to content
Recent News
  • I have recently published a paper in Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy! Click HERE for more details.
  • Romantic Metasubjectivity has been officially accepted for publication by Routledge! Click HERE for more details.
  • I have been invited to contribute to the forthcoming Palgrave-Macmillan Handbook of German Idealism and Poststructuralism. Click HERE for more details.
  • Congratulations to Geordie for scoring 91% on a term paper in Modernist literature!
  • LiquidFractal is always evolving, and your opinion matters! Please post your thoughts and feedback in the Suggestions forum.
  • Congratulations to Keigan for scoring in the 95.5th percentile on his STAT university entrance exam!
  • Want to schedule tuition or a project meeting? Please use the Availability Schedule as a guide to see my availability on a given day.
  • Check this news ticker for recent LiquidFractal announcements and bulletins.
  • CPRG Blog

today: Michael Dix, "Fake history of philosophy: a case study"

Sign in to follow this  
Gord Barentsen

124 views

 

As reposted from @Arran Gare:

Dear members of the complex processes research group,

The next meeting of the complex processes on the theme of history will feature:

SPEAKER: Dr Michael Dix

TITLE: Fake history of philosophy: a case study

TIME: 12.30pm, Wednesday, 19th September

VENUE: ATC205

Abstract:

The ontology of Heraclitus, the first western philosopher of process, has been much misinterpreted for two and a half millennia. A consideration of how such misunderstanding arose and persisted reveals a tradition of “Whiggish” history in philosophy—a history biased toward the worldview and culture of “the winners” as if assuming this to be history’s “goal”—in this case, a history that systematically obscures and misunderstands the philosophical tradition of process philosophy, dialectical metaphysics and dialectical reason. The case-study of my title is John Burnet’s Early Greek Philosophy (1930) in which Burnet’s commitment to an analytical substance-and-property ontology aligned with modern scientific materialism impairs his understanding of contrary traditions and blinds him even to the contrary evidence of Heraclitus’ own words. A corollary of the fake history of process philosophy is systemic failure to understand Heraclitean and later process-philosophy postulation of a dialectical metaphysics of emergence. By bringing these systemic misunderstandings to light, this case-study reveals the difficulties involved in communicating an emergentist philosophy of process to a culture based in fundamentally different metaphysical assumptions—whether they be those of Athenian Hellenism, Enlightenment humanism, or today’s scientific materialism.

Sign in to follow this  


0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Recent Forum Posts

Privacy & Terms

All use of LiquidFractal's website and services, paid and/or unpaid, is subject to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Registration.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Hello guest! In using this site you agree to LiquidFractal's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy